Abstract
This preliminary note introduces the
Systemic–Systematic Coordinate Model (SSCM)
as a compact visual and conceptual tool for describing how practices combine systemic and systematic modes of engagement. The systemic–systematic pairing is not introduced here as a new distinction. Prior work has treated the two as an important duality in systems thinking and practice, and recent applied research has represented their relationship as a continuum or spectrum of proportional distribution. SSCM builds on this pairing but proposes a different representational geometry: systemic engagement and systematic engagement are modeled as two analytically separable, gradable dimensions rather than as opposing proportions along a single spectrum. This makes it possible to describe high–high, low–low, and asymmetric configurations. The note presents the basic SSCM diagram, clarifies its two axes, and outlines expected uses and cautions. It also argues that SSCM placements are frame-specific and require minimal specification of four elements: the relevant whole (W), boundary setter (B), metrics, evidence, and success criteria (M), and affected parties and actors (A). SSCM is offered as a conceptual map, not as a measurement instrument, ranking scheme, or replacement for existing systems methodologies.