Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Interlaboratory variability in HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) interpretation remains a major challenge. Conventional agreement metrics quantify disagreement but do not distinguish discrepancies by diagnostic relevance. We aimed to develop a likelihood ratio (LR)-based framework for clinically informed assessment of interpretation variability.
Methods
Pattern-specific positive LRs were derived from 33,690 routine HEp-2 IFA records and used to classify patterns into four risk tiers. A pattern discrepancy score (PDS) was developed to quantify discrepancies according to risk-tier displacement. Interlaboratory variability was assessed using a standardized 200-specimen panel tested by 18 laboratories, and diagnostic performance was explored in six laboratories.
Results
Pattern disagreement rates ranged from 17.5 to 50.0 %. PDS strongly correlated with disagreement rate (Spearman’s ρ=0.936, p
Conclusions
HEp-2 IFA interpretation variability differs in both frequency and potential diagnostic relevance. The LR-based framework and PDS complement conventional agreement measures by identifying discrepancies that alter diagnostic risk classification, potentially supporting risk-oriented proficiency assessment and targeted quality improvement.