Abstract
Nathaniel LaBarre, Michael Karo, Vidhani Goel, Roberto Sagaribay, Vinnesa Narvaez, Ami Shah, Fatehali Peera, Kavita Batra
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Incidence of dog bite injuries treated in emergency departments
10.1001/jama.279.1.51
Epidemiology and patterns of dog bite-related head and neck injuries: a NEISS database study
10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112535
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Epidemiology of dog bites to people in Uruguay (2010-2020)
10.1002/vms3.1242
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Dog-related deaths registered in England and Wales from 2001 to 2021
10.1016/j.puhe.2022.12.005
Dog bite injuries in children seen at a tertiary care hospital in Bolivia
10.5546/aap.2022-02928.eng
Dog bites: still a problem?
10.1136/ip.2007.016220
Dog bites of the scalp, face, and neck in children
10.1097/00005537-200303000-00018
Pediatric dog bite injury trends during the COVID-19 pandemic
10.1097/pec.0000000000003378
Are children and dogs best friends? A scoping review to explore the positive and negative effects of child-dog interactions
10.7717/peerj.14532
Medico-legal implications of dog bite injuries: a systematic review
10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111849
Cave canem (beware of the dog): severe complications following a bite by a small dog
10.1080/20469047.2025.2500875
Psychological sequelae of dog bites in children: a review
10.3390/children11101218
Risk factors associated with infection in patients sustaining dog bites to the face
10.1007/s10006-022-01066-x
Pediatric dog bites: a review of 1422 cases treated at a level one regional pediatric trauma center
10.1097/scs.0000000000008209
PC26. Pediatric dog bite injuries: a 5-year nationwide study of over 56,000 patients
10.1097/01.gox.0000828356.57037.2a
Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: is the bark actually worse than the bite?
10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4
Education of children and adolescents for the prevention of dog bite injuries
10.1002/14651858.cd004726.pub2
Systematic review: interventions to educate children about dog safety and prevent pediatric dog-bite injuries: a meta-analytic review
10.1093/jpepsy/jsv164
Mandatory desexing of dogs: one step in the right direction to reduce the risk of dog bite? A systematic review
10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042141
Systematic review of dog bite prevention strategies
10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044477
Epidemiology of animal bite in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.4103/jrms.jrms_190_22
Characterization of the variables related to reports of death due to canine bites in scientific articles during the years 2013-2017: a systematic review
10.3390/ani11092654
Dog bites in the United States from 1971 to 2018: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature
10.1097/prs.0000000000007253
Infection prevention and treatment following dog bites: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
10.20408/jti.2024.0069
Pediatric dog bite injuries in the USA: a systematic review
10.1136/wjps-2021-000281
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
10.1136/bmj.g7647
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71
Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000054
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence
10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
10.1186/s12874-020-00975-3
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients
10.1136/bmj.h870
The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
10.1186/1471-2288-14-25
Meta-analysis of prevalence
10.1136/jech-2013-203104
Transformations related to the angular and the square root
10.1214/aoms/1177729756
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · doi-reference
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247 · doi-reference