Abstract
This study explores the concept of just peacebuilding in post-war contexts, examining the mechanisms and conditions necessary to establish sustainable peace grounded in justice and reconciliation. Moving beyond a narrow focus on the cessation of armed conflict, the discussion emphasizes the reconstruction of social relations, the promotion of human security, and the creation of legitimate institutions capable of addressing grievances fairly. The research highlights that peace is not a neutral process; rather, it requires active engagement from both state and non-state actors, including civil society, grassroots movements, and international organizations. These actors play complementary roles in promoting dialogue, fostering reconciliation, and strengthening the social fabric fractured by war. The analysis underscores the centrality of negotiation and peace agreements grounded in mutual commitment, with justice and fairness as guiding principles. Without genuine political will and inclusive participation, agreements risk becoming fragile truces vulnerable to collapse. Equally important, the study stresses that reconciliation entails a delicate balance between justice and compromise, as lasting stability often requires concessions that transcend unresolved historical grievances.
Ultimately, the paper argues that sustainable peace cannot be reduced to temporary settlements or imposed arrangements. Instead, it must be rooted in ethical principles, shared responsibility, and institutional frameworks that guarantee accountability, fairness, and respect for human dignity. Peacebuilding, therefore, emerges as a dynamic and long-term process that integrates justice, reconciliation, and human development to achieve genuine stability after war.