Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic surgical approaches to degenerative spinal pathologies may revolutionize the landscape of minimally invasive spine surgery. Given the novelty of endoscopic approaches, there remains a paucity of large-scale data to examine the unique risk and complication profile of their application in revision surgery. Thus, the authors utilized a large dataset to compare the risk profile and outcome metrics of primary versus revision thoracolumbar endoscopic decompressions and discectomies.
METHODS
This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of a multi-institutional, prospectively enrolled registry managed by the Endoscopic Spine Research Group. Demographic, perioperative, and self-reported outcome data for patients undergoing endoscopic spinal procedures from March 1, 2021, to February 1, 2026, were collected. Comparisons between primary and revision cohorts were performed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Multivariable models were generated to assess age, BMI, sex, smoking status, and baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Linear regression models were used for continuous outcomes, and logistic regression models were applied for binary outcomes. Statistical significance was set as p
RESULTS
In total, 1379 patients met the study inclusion criteria and had undergone 1138 primary procedures (82.5%) and 241 revision procedures (17.5%). Revision procedures consisted of a higher proportion of discectomies (85.9% vs 76.0%, p
CONCLUSIONS
The authors conducted a retrospective review of a large, multicenter cohort, demonstrating similar outcomes between primary and revision thoracolumbar endoscopic decompression and discectomies, as measured by the ODI and an MCID in the ODI.