Abstract
Luis Luque, Jennifer Hubert
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
ror
Confidence 99%
openalex
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2017
GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR conundrum
10.3389/fpls.2023.1232938 · 2023
Core and supplementary studies to assess the safety of genetically modified (GM) plants used for food and feed
10.21423/jrs-v09i1brune · 2021
GM food and crops: what went wrong in the UK?
10.1038/sj.embor.7400160 · 2004
Unresolved referenced work
2023
Unresolved referenced work
2024
Unresolved referenced work
2025
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Unresolved referenced work
2023
Unresolved referenced work
2024
Unresolved referenced work
2007
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
CRISPR/cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture
10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049 · 2019
Applications of multiplexed CRISPR–cas for genome engineering
10.1038/s12276-025-01500-6 · 2025
Unresolved referenced work
2003
Unresolved referenced work
2023
Unresolved referenced work
2026
Unresolved referenced work
2021
Unresolved referenced work
1999
Unresolved referenced work
2022
New plant breeding techniques and their regulatory implications: an opportunity to advance metabolomics approaches
10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153378 · 2021
Evolving regulatory landscape for genome-edited plants
10.1089/crispr.2018.0016 · doi-reference
Gene editing regulation and innovation economics
10.1080/21645698.2015.1114698 · doi-reference
Genome editing around the globe: an update on policies and perceptions
10.1093/plphys/kiac359 · doi-reference
Regulatory barriers to innovative plant breeding in Canada
10.3389/fgeed.2020.591592 · doi-reference
Investment, regulation, and uncertainty
10.4161/gmcr.27465 · doi-reference
Genetic variation and unintended risk in the context of old and new breeding techniques
10.1080/07352689.2021.1883826 · doi-reference
A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments
10.1007/s11248-014-9843-7 · doi-reference
Global status of genome editing versus transgenesis legislation in plants and the current EU situation
10.1038/s44383-025-00016-2 · doi-reference
Genome edited crops touch the market: a view on the global development and regulatory environment
10.3389/fpls.2020.586027 · doi-reference
Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: a baseline comparator for genome editing
10.3389/fgeed.2022.937853 · doi-reference
New plant breeding techniques
10.2791/54761 · doi-reference
Reducing the regulatory burden of plant biotechnology regulations in Canada
10.1139/gen-2024-0164 · doi-reference
The GMO case in France: politics, lawlessness and postmodernism
10.4161/21645698.2014.945882 · doi-reference
Potential, challenges, and threats for the application of new breeding techniques by the private plant breeding sector in the EU
10.3389/fpls.2020.582011 · doi-reference
Proving that a genome-edited organism is not GMO
10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.11.001 · doi-reference
New plant breeding techniques and their regulatory implications: an opportunity to advance metabolomics approaches
10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153378 · doi-reference
Applications of multiplexed CRISPR–cas for genome engineering
10.1038/s12276-025-01500-6 · doi-reference
CRISPR/cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture
10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049 · doi-reference
GM food and crops: what went wrong in the UK?
10.1038/sj.embor.7400160 · doi-reference
Core and supplementary studies to assess the safety of genetically modified (GM) plants used for food and feed
10.21423/jrs-v09i1brune · doi-reference
GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR conundrum
10.3389/fpls.2023.1232938 · doi-reference