A novel provocation protocol to identify nocebo effects in clinical practice—a proof-of-concept n-of-1 study

Introduction Nocebo effects, driven by negative expectations rather than pharmacological mechanisms, are an under-recognized cause of adverse effects in clinical practice. Although experimental studies have used expectation manipulation to explore these phenomena, translation into clinical diagnostic approaches remains limited. We report the first clinical application of a novel provocation protocol in a single patient as an n-of-1 trial to illustrate its potential to identify whether reported adverse events in this patient were driven by nocebo mechanisms. Methods We developed an extension of the crossover balanced placebo design incorporating additional manipulation of patient expectations comprising five structured provocation sessions using an active substance or placebo combined with correct, and intentionally misleading declarations under open-label and blinded conditions. As a proof-of-concept this protocol was applied to a single patient with self-reported alcohol intolerance using ethanol and water. Symptom severity for each provocation was assessed using a numeric rating scale and analyzed descriptively. Results The most severe symptoms followed the administration of open-label ethanol (mean numeric rating scale [NRS] 5.3; maximum 8) and water deceptively labeled as ethanol (mean NRS 4.1; maximum 7), while blinded ethanol (mean NRS 2.8; maximum 5) and blinded water (mean NRS 2.6, maximum 5) produced only mild reactions. These findings are consistent with adverse reactions in this single patient primarily driven by expectations, indicating a nocebo mechanism. Conclusion This report demonstrates the proof-of-concept value of a novel “mixed open blinded crossover balanced placebo provocation protocol” and illustrates the potential to identify nocebo effects in clinical practice. Whether this exploratory finding have broader relevance warrants investigation in larger cohorts.