Abstract
Introduction
Computational classifiers can be benchmarked against public encoded splice-junction datasets, but the performance estimate will depend on the input representation, preprocessing pipeline, model set-up and evaluation design.
Methods
This study investigates the performance of 15 different Convolutional, Hybrid and Deep Learning architectures on a public encoded splice-junction dataset for 3-class classification. The results of the primary models were archived from one train/validation/held-out-test workflow and are presented as illustrative effects and not as statistically significant evidence of superiority.
Results
The highest held-out test accuracy (96.87%) was obtained with the Custom CNN from among the configurations that were saved. The MLP Mixer was the most highly accurate model during training (99.90%), but the model did not perform as well on the validation set (93.33%) or held-out test set (93.73%), suggesting some in-sample fitting. Model-capacity information, parameter-to-sample ratios, learning curves, class-wise metrics, and a targeted class-weighting comparison are reported. Class-weighting was performed during the training phase only, but class-weighting did not yield highest performance for the tested Custom CNN configuration. of the chosen Custom CNN configuration for the observed dataset.
Discussion
The conclusions are limited to the classification results that could be computed for the encoded benchmark dataset and the reported evaluation procedure. The results do not demonstrate a statistically significant superiority of the models in the sense of external generalization, clinical diagnostic validity, patient-based mutation detection, clinical utility or readiness for deployment. Leakage-free repeated evaluation, external datasets, stored sample predictions, statistically comparison of models’ outputs, and clinically validated patient-level data would be needed for more general conclusions.