Abstract
With the rapid development of graph neural networks and physics-informed machine learning for critical infrastructure risk, reliable assessment of submarine telecommunication cables has become both a practical resilience requirement and a demanding cross-domain learning problem. These cables carry more than 99% of international data traffic, yet fault risk modeling faces four explicit challenges: (1) modality misalignment, because marine evidence combines gridded environmental fields with irregular vessel trajectories; (2) relational heterogeneity, because hazards interact through semantically distinct spatial links; (3) physical inconsistency, because unconstrained predictions may violate seabed geomechanics under geographic shift; and (4) decision uncertainty, because safety-critical inspection and routing require uncertainty rather than point estimates alone. The closest approaches leave identifiable gaps. Makrakis and colleagues optimized static cable routes without learned hazard interactions or uncertainty; Taghizadeh and colleagues constrained flood graph predictions without cable-specific heterogeneous entities; and Guo and colleagues fused maritime trajectories without forecasting cable faults or screening routes. No existing approaches combine these missing capabilities under geographically held-out cable basins. To address this gap, the present paper proposes MarineGuard-GNN, a physics-informed multimodal heterogeneous graph neural network. Its Cross-Modal Spatiotemporal Tokenizer maps GEBCO bathymetry, CMEMS ocean fields, and NOAA AIS trajectories into a shared 256-dimensional space; a relation-aware Heterogeneous Graph Transformer represents four semantic node types and four physical relation types; a differentiable Mohr–Coulomb loss regularizes geomechanical consistency; and a Monte Carlo dropout risk head estimates segment-level epistemic uncertainty for inspection and routing. Under 4-fold geographic cross-validation at natural prevalence on 15,110 cable nodes (847 faults), MarineGuard-GNN attains cross-basin AUC-ROC, average-precision, and F1 ranges of 0.72–0.76, 0.18–0.24, and 0.29–0.36, respectively; average precision corresponds to a 3.21–4.28× lift over the 0.0561 no-skill prevalence baseline. Paired basin-stratified bootstrap analysis and Holm-corrected tests confirm improvements over the strongest tabular and graph baselines (ΔAUC-ROC ≥0.02, ΔAP ≥0.03; padj<0.05). Matched ablation shows that removing the corrected mechanics term reduces AUC-ROC by 0.005 and average precision by 0.010 without improving calibration. Across three densely sampled public cable corridors, uncertainty-aware routing reduces mean predicted risk by at least 5% while limiting distance overhead to below 3%; the conclusion remains stable for risk thresholds from 0.45 to 0.60. These results demonstrate statistically supported cross-basin generalization, establishing the proposed framework as a reproducible decision support method.