Abstract
The rising threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has prompted the need for alternative
approaches to managing antibiotic use in animal production. This study investigates the impact of
restrictive antibiotic use in Sweden’s animal production sector, focusing on its implications for
AMR containment. Using a qualitative approach, the research explores the perspectives of key
stakeholders, including farmers, veterinarians, and policymakers, on the feasibility and
effectiveness of antibiotic restrictions. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were
conducted to assess the strategies adopted, challenges faced, and the perceived benefits and
drawbacks of reduced antibiotic usage in animal husbandry. Findings indicate that while
restrictive measures have contributed to a reduction in antibiotic use, they also highlight concerns
regarding animal health, productivity, and economic viability. Additionally, stakeholders
emphasized the need for more robust surveillance systems, education on alternative management
practices, and greater cooperation among various sectors to ensure the sustainable success of
antibiotic reduction strategies. This study underscores the importance of balancing antibiotic
stewardship with the overall well-being of the animal production system to effectively combat
AMR.