Abstract
Guerrilla tactics in arbitration represent a growing threat to the integrity, efficiency, and
finality of dispute resolution. These deliberate acts designed to frustrate, delay, or derail
arbitral proceedings, blur the line between zealous advocacy and procedural abuse. This
article examines the manifestations of guerrilla tactics across the lifecycle of arbitration, from
the pre-arbitral stage through to post-award enforcement. It analyses the ethical burdens these
tactics place on arbitrators and counsel, and evaluates recent legislative innovations under
Nigeria’s Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023, including the Award Review Tribunal, arbitrator
immunity, and restricted court interference. The article argues that a combination of robust
procedural case management, a strengthened sanctions regime, expedited procedures, and
harmonised ethical standards offers the most viable path toward insulating arbitration from
strategic abuse.