If your browser cannot display the PDF here, use “Open PDF in a new tab”.
Abstract
Examining colonial raciolinguistic dynamics in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart (1958/2006), the present study treats the novel as a corpus for sociolinguistic analysis, not merely as a literary text with sociolinguistic themes. Linguistic imperialism, decolonization theory, and Fanonian phenomenology have provided analytical frameworks for understanding colonial language hierarchy in African literatures, but all lack consideration of racial perception as a constitutive element of language subordination. This gap in the literature is bridged here through the application of the raciolinguistic ideologies framework, which shifts focus from what racialized speakers say/do to how colonial institutions come to hear them as inadequate. Detailed analysis of five strategic passages reveals how Achebe carefully builds a raciolinguistic counter-archive that validates Igbo metalinguistic awareness by turning the colonial gaze around, recording epistemic reciprocity, and theorizing settler destruction on Igbo terms (terms that do not take up the colonial system of evaluation). The conclusion is that the novel never says that the Igbo are legitimate according to colonial standards. Rather, it builds something entirely different that never used that scale of evaluation in the first place. This study expands raciolinguistics beyond its current U.S.-centric body of empirical evidence and positions postcolonial literary texts as legitimate venues for raciolinguistic analysis.