Abstract
ABSTRACT
Perceptual decisions are widely modeled as the accumulation of evidence to a bound. In the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), this computation is thought to be implemented in a low-dimensional population representation organized around the single action used to report the choice, consistent with an intentional framework. The intentional framework, however, implies that changing the behavioral demands on the report should change the representation itself, raising a question about the generality of the low-dimensional decision representation described in LIP: is it a special case of decisions reported through a single action, or does it reflect a more general computational architecture that can support multiple behavioral outputs? We tested this by training monkeys to report the
termination
of a motion-discrimination decision with a saccade to a choice-neutral target, and its
content
only later, with a saccade to one of two choice targets. Even though the two reports were behaviorally separable, the timing of termination remained systematically linked to the accumulation of sensory evidence supporting the eventual choice in both monkeys, indicating that both reports continued to draw on a common underlying computation. Using high-density Neuropixels recordings from LIP, however, we found that decision termination and decision content were represented along orthogonal population coding directions supported by largely non-overlapping groups of neurons. Yet the two representations were not independent: trial-by-trial fluctuations in the population encoding content predicted subsequent fluctuations in the population encoding termination, with their coupling strengthening as the decision evolved. These results suggest that a single decision computation can be flexibly reformatted into distinct, action-specific representations, coordinated by selective transfer of information between neural populations.