Abstract
Accurate prediction of individual medical outcomes is essential for optimizing treatment allocation amid rising costs, coverage denials, and limited clinical resources. Traditional predictive models, including linear regression and neural networks, rely on average effects and cannot tailor predictions to the specific circumstances of individual cases. We present relevance-based prediction (RBP), a model-free and task-specific method that predicts outcomes as weighted averages of observed cases, with weights determined by a rigorously defined and theoretically justified measure of relevance. Unlike model-based methods that rely on fixed calibrated parameters, relevance-based prediction revisits the original data for each prediction and customizes both the cases and variables used. We illustrate RBP by applying it to predict opioid treatment outcomes and demonstrate that it provides case-specific insights unavailable from conventional models, including how each prior case informs a prediction, how each variable affects each predictions reliability and value, and how reliable each prediction is before it is made. These individualized insights may prevent misleading average-based decisions and reduce harmful or suboptimal treatment.