Abstract
Abstract
Habitat destruction leads to a severe decline in biodiversity. Ascertaining effects of habitat loss afterwards is regularly done, whereas predicting the effects of different habitat loss scenarios on biodiversity beforehand is much preferred but as of yet rarely possible. Such predictions would help inform management decisions to prevent biodiversity loss in the first place, or at least mitigate effects if necessary, by providing handles to set priorities in making trade-offs.
To this end, we developed and applied an adapted version of the information-theoretical framework of Maximum Entropy Theory in Ecology (METE) to predict species-area relationships in tropical forest landscapes undergoing habitat loss and fragmentation. Species-area relationships provide information about biodiversity and can, in undisturbed systems, be predicted using METE, based on state variables such as the total number of individuals, the total number of species, and the total area size. In disturbed systems, however, it is established that METE’s predictions are off. Using an individual-based model, we explore how METE’s state variables should be adjusted, based on the landscape characteristics habitat cover and degree of habitat fragmentation, to restore its accuracy of species-area relationship predictions in disturbed environments.
We validate our adjusted METE predictions with empirical data. Our adjusted METE predictions demonstrate the severity of fragmentation’s impact on biodiversity, relative to what could be expected in a pristine, continuous environment. With this new method, we can estimate the immediate effects of habitat loss on biodiversity, as well as its long-term effects.