Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To quantify, in a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) benchmark, how spatial degradation, temporal acquisition and noise change the error of plane-based pulmonary-artery flow endpoints.
Methods
Twenty-two historical, non-converged CFD simulations (11 geometry families) were voxelised at 2 mm with 80 frames per cycle. Simulations with numerical divergence were excluded, leaving 13 (7 families). Fields were degraded to 4 and 8mm and with noise, plane waveforms were sampled at 20 phases with one-interval averaging, and errors were computed against the noise-free reference waveform on 66 geometric planes. Family-mean paired differences are reported with t-based 95% confidence intervals under an analysis plan fixed in advance.
Results
Spatial degradation from 2 to 4mm increased full-waveform nRMSE by 0.0032 [0.0021, 0.0043], in 7 of 7 families; cycle-mean flow bias accounted for 23% of the squared error, against 60% at 8 mm. With SNR scaled to voxel volume, the increase was not resolved (0.0002 [−0.0012, 0.0015]). Twenty-phase acquisition increased PI error (0.0223 [0.0214, 0.0233]) and diastolic-trough timing error (0.63 [0.52, 0.74] frames) more than spatial degradation, and its point estimates for these endpoints were larger with every recovery method; the nRMSE ordering and peak timing depended on the recovery method. The implementation of the downsampling operator mattered: an alternative, corner-aligned implementation of the same 4mm degradation gave a larger spatial effect (nRMSE difference 0.0010 [0.0002, 0.0017]).
Conclusion
In this benchmark, a 2 to 4mm degradation produced a small, consistent, mostly shape-related nRMSE increase that depended on the noise model, whereas 20-phase acquisition changed PI error and trough timing more. The results describe benchmark behaviour, not clinical acquisition requirements.