Abstract
Abstract
Despite lacking a dedicated structural function, brain tissue is exposed to severe mechanical loading during accidents and trauma, with potentially permanent or lethal consequences. Therefore, characterizing its mechanical behavior assumes particular importance for designing protective equipment, planning surgeries, and training neurosurgeons, tasks that often rely on physical brain replicas made from phantom materials. Although the mechanics of brain tissue has been extensively studied, the selection of suitable phantom materials still relies on simplified metrics that fail to capture the highly nonlinear and rate-dependent behavior of the brain. In this work, we characterize the mechanical response at low-to-medium strain rates of common synthetic brain phantom materials, including Sylgard 527, Ecoflex Gel, and a composite hydrogel, and establish rigorous comparisons with porcine brain tissue as a benchmark. To this end, we employ a multistep stress relaxation protocol under both uniaxial extension and compression across two different strain rates, introduce thermodynamic metrics, and perform comparisons based on rigorous statistical analysis. In particular, we isolate the thermodynamic equilibrium stress-strain curves, representing the baseline material’s response, from rate-dependent dissipative inelastic effects, relatable to viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanisms. Our results provide a thorough comparison, revealing critical limitations in existing simulant materials and highlighting significant space for developing improved brain surrogates. The comprehensive dataset collected can also support the calibration of constitutive models, enhancing the predictive accuracy of numerical simulations involving brain tissue and its surrogates. More broadly, this study highlights the need to move beyond simplistic, scalar-metric-based comparisons of mechanical responses across materials.