Abstract
Aim:
To test whether individual movement mechanisms inferred from animal tracking data can be scaled up to explain landscape-scale patterns of population density and improve predictions of population redistribution under future environmental change.
Location:
Texas Gulf Coast, USA
Time Period:
2009-2018
Major Taxa Studied:
Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
Methods:
We parameterized individual-level step-selection functions using 14,898 GPS locations from 22 Whooping Cranes and propagated the resulting movement and habitat-selection mechanisms across the landscape to derive steady-state distributions of space use. We compared these movement-informed predictions with correlative species distribution models fitted to the same data. Predictions were evaluated using withheld tracking observations and fully independent population-level aerial-survey data. We then projected both approaches under sea-level-rise scenarios to assess how future habitat loss and fragmentation alter crane space use.
Results:
Movement mechanisms derived from individual-level tracking data captured the mechanistic dependence of population density on habitat quality and spatial configuration. When projected across the landscape, these mechanisms reproduced fully independently observed density patterns and outperformed conventional species distribution models. Because predictions arose from movement mechanisms rather than occurrence-environment correlations, movement-informed models also captured the effects of habitat reconfiguration under sea-level rise. They projected pronounced population redistribution and an expansion of core space-use areas of up to 80% which conventional models missed.
Main Conclusions:
Individual movement mechanisms derived from biologging data can scale up to explain current population structure and predict future redistribution under environmental change. By mechanistically accounting for how habitat configuration constrains accessibility, movement-informed models reveal severe impacts of fragmentation that are missed by conventional distribution models. Rapidly expanding biologging datasets therefore offer a scalable basis for connecting individual behavior to macroecological patterns and improving biodiversity forecasts in changing landscapes.