Abstract
Introduction: Raised blood pressure is an important cardiovascular risk factor in Cambodia; however, national averages may obscure substantial local geographic heterogeneity. We assessed the spatial distribution of raised blood pressure and its demographic, metabolic, behavioural, built-environment, and environmental correlates using the 2023 Cambodia STEPwise approach to noncommunicable disease (NCD) risk factor surveillance (STEPS) survey.
Methods: We analysed 289 georeferenced primary sampling units (PSUs) from the 2023 Cambodia STEPS Survey. PSU-level case counts and numbers of adults with valid blood pressure data were modelled using a frequentist binomial generalised additive model with a two-dimensional Gaussian-process smooth. An explanatory model included selected PSU-level and contextual covariates; a separate mapping model used spatially continuous predictors to generate predictions on a 5-km grid. Design-based national and residence-specific prevalence estimates were calculated separately using the survey design and Step-2 weights.
Results: Among 4,225 adults with valid blood pressure data, unweighted prevalence of raised blood pressure was 28.6%, compared with 18.8% after Step-2 weighting; weighted prevalence was 17.5% in rural areas and 21.7% in urban/suburban areas. Mean observed unweighted PSU-level prevalence was 29.0%. In the adjusted spatial explanatory model, the proportion aged 60-69 years (β=1.969, SE=0.327; p<0.001) and overweight/obesity prevalence (β=0.996, SE=0.265; p<0.001) were positive ecological correlates. The spatial model had lower Akaike information criterion and residual deviance than its non-spatial counterpart, although Bayesian information criterion was higher. Prediction uncertainty was greater in some sparsely sampled areas.
Conclusions: Raised blood pressure showed significant geographic heterogeneity across Cambodia. Older age composition and overweight/obesity prevalence were positive PSU-level correlates, not individual-level causal effects. Predicted prevalence should be interpreted alongside uncertainty and should complement, rather than replace, design-based STEPS prevalence estimates for geographically informed NCD planning.