Abstract
Background
Urban inequities are often masked by the misleading notion of an urban advantage, despite persistent unequal access to quality healthcare services. Moreover, negative perceptions about the urban poor and slum-dwellers persist, despite their substantial role in driving and holding up the urban economy. It is thus essential to work with the media to bring visibility to these realities, raise public awareness, and inform more equitable health policies. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), evidence remains scarce on how health-related information from media outlets influences policy decisions. This study aimed to understand how journalists get information, engage with stakeholders in the health systems, and contribute to influencing urban health discourse in Bangladesh and Nepal.
Methods
We conducted a cross-country exploratory qualitative study comprising 30 key informant interviews from Bangladesh and Nepal, including 17 journalists, 10 health policymakers, and 3 public health advocates. Participants were purposively selected to ensure diversity across media types, gender, and professional roles. Interviews were conducted between September 2024 and March 2025. Data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed thematically using NVivo software. Cross-country comparative analysis was carried out to identify common themes and contextual differences.
Findings
Across both countries, participants relied on multiple and diverse information sources. Government data were often prioritized as a primary source of information, although they were shaped by political influences and accessibility constraints. Research evidence was valued but underutilized due to difficulties in interpreting scientific articles. Urban health issues received limited priority in health news reporting due to journalists’ constraints in covering multiple issues and financial constraints for in-depth coverage. Additional challenges included inadequate health and urban health-related training, limited fellowship opportunities for investigative reporting, and restricted access to data, while health policymakers and public health advocates frequently questioned the credibility and use of media-reported information. Media engagement in policymaking largely remained indirect and issue-focused or event-driven. However, consistent media coverage raised public awareness and generated public pressure and, at times, indirectly influenced health policy decisions such as immediate inspection after reporting on pesticides, installation of oxygen plants during the pandemic, dengue surveillance, and tobacco control measures and actions.
Conclusion
In Bangladesh and Nepal, news media play a significant but indirect role in shaping urban health policy decisions. Enhancing journalists’ capacity, improving access to credible information and data, and continuous engagement of stakeholders could strengthen evidence-informed urban health policymaking. Furthermore, establishing greater independence of journalists and government and community recognition of their responsible health reporting could help and motivate the media to contribute more meaningfully to public debate and policy reform processes.