Abstract
Negative emotional bias, including reduced processing of positive information and negative interpretation of ambiguous stimuli, is a core feature of depression. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), reduces depressive symptoms, but its effects on distinct components of emotional processing remain unclear. Fifty-three patients with TRD and 53 healthy controls performed an Emotional Facial Expression Morphing task. Patients were assessed at baseline, 24 hours after the first esketamine administration, and after 4 weeks of treatment. Statistical models examined detection thresholds for happy and sad faces, negative categorisation of neutral faces, and signal detection indices separating emotion-neutral discrimination sensitivity (d') from response criterion (c), indexing the evidence required to report the presence of an emotion. At baseline, patients required greater happy-face intensity for emotion detection and were more likely to categorise detected neutral faces as negative. They also showed a more conservative response criterion without group difference in discrimination sensitivity. Responders showed an early increase in d'; and, by week 4, less negative categorisation of neutral faces than non-responders. A lower baseline response criterion was associated with responder status and, in secondary continuous analyses, with greater subsequent MADRS improvement. These findings indicate that TRD involves abnormalities across detection-related, valence-related, and decisional aspects of facial-emotion processing that are differently associated with esketamine response: baseline response criterion emerged as a candidate prognostic marker, whereas negative categorisation of neutral faces tracked clinical response. Assessing these domains may inform clinical evaluation, pending independent replication.