Abstract
Health systems increasingly record ICD-10 Z59 social-needs codes for housing, food, transportation, and related hardship to trigger referrals, report quality, and adjust risk. However code documentation occurs at varying rates and no study has separated what the code says about a patient's hardship from what it says about being documented at all. Using a linked electronic health record and claims corpus covering 4.95 million patients in 21 identifiable health systems, we matched 26,153 adults with a first outpatient Z59 code to similar uncoded patients and, as a negative control, repeated the entire design around an administrative code. Coding ranged from 1 percent to 24 percent of patients across systems and remained highly variable after adjustment for patient mix. A hardship code was associated with 67% (95% CI=1.61, 1.74) more emergency department (ED) visits and 43% ( 95% CI=1.38, 1.49) more hospital admissions in the next year (62 versus 49 of every 100 patients with any acute event). The administrative-code reproduced 46 percent of the Z59 association for ED visits and 70 percent for admissions. In the five systems with the most complete stay dates, no hardship-specific admission excess was detectable. Homelessness codes forecast two and a half times the ED visit rate. At national planning prices, excess emergency and preventable hospital care totaled roughly $2,000 to $2,500 per coded patient-year ($2,516 base scenario; about $1,100 under an exploratory assumed-discount scenario (not an estimate of hardship-attributable spending)), with the largest emergency burden among Medicaid patients. The Z code added no increment to clinical and utilization-based risk prediction models in any system.