Abstract
Research on war-related environmental contamination often generates extensive knowledge about individual substances, sites, diseases, infrastructures, and episodes without constituting long-term military contamination as a continuous object of investigation. This paper examines that failure as a property of scientific organization rather than merely an absence of data or an ethical defect of researchers. It defines political taboo as a distributed, historically variable system regulating which questions, connections, temporal scales, and causal interpretations gain scientific legitimacy.
Four recurrent mechanisms are identified. Temporal suspension treats investigation as premature during war and unnecessary after a politically sufficient account of responsibility emerges. Disciplinary fragmentation documents separate manifestations without reconstructing connections among sources, transport, exposure, biological response, and delayed health effects. Selective acceleration directs research toward knowledge of immediate operational value while deferring long-term consequences. Causal inquiry may also be recoded as a test of political loyalty.
Together, these mechanisms produce pathological uncertainty by interrupting observation, separating environmental and health records, preserving incompatible data structures, and increasing evidentiary burdens after early evidence disappears. The paper argues that analysis of scientific communities should complement toxicological, ecological, epidemiological, archival, and geospatial investigation in reliably reconstructing coherent causal processes.