Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Open public full textRights: UNKNOWN · https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Michael R. Greenberg
Abstract
Rights: UNKNOWN · https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
2014 · 0 citations
Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding
2014 · 0 citations
Reinventing rules for environmental risk governance in the energy sector
2014 · 0 citations
Unresolved referenced work
1998
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
1995
Trust relations in high-reliability organizations
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00820.x · 2006
The role of distrust in offshore safety performance
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00822.x · 2006
Character-based determinants of trust in leaders
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00823.x · 2006
Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry
10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00049-7 · 2001
Test of trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks
10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · 2003
Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation
10.1111/1539-6924.00373 · 2003
The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.x · 1997
Determining the determinants of trust. Letter to the editor
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01288.x · 1998
Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding
2014 · 0 citations
Institutional trust and confidence: a journey into a conceptual quagmire
1999
How much do people who live near major nuclear facilities worry about those facilities? Analysis of national and site-specific data
10.1080/09640560903181063 · 2009
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Nuclear waste management and nuclear power: a tale of two essential United States Department of Energy sites in Idaho and New Mexico
2014
Willingness to pay for a sustainable shoreline: Public reactions follow Superstorm Sandy in New Jersey, USA
2013
Unresolved referenced work
1997
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2000
Unresolved referenced work
1998
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
1994
Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable
10.1080/09640568.2011.623070 · 2012
Unresolved referenced work
2013
The public's preparedness: self-reliance, flashbulb memories and conservative preferences
10.2105/ajph.2012.301198 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Population trends around nuclear power plants
1984
A review of population projections: the case of commercial nuclear power stations
1984
Unresolved referenced work
2006
Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00533.x · 1990
Lessons from Yucca Mountain
10.1080/00139157.1991.9931375 · 1991
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x · 2011
Nuclear waste and public worries: public perceptions of the United States major nuclear weapons legacy sites
2007
Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01476.x · 1996
Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon: results of a statewide survey
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00022.x · 1994
Credibility, public trust, and the transport of radioactive waste through local communities
10.1177/0013916596283002 · 1996
Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x · 2005
Reinventing rules for environmental risk governance in the energy sector
10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.013 · doi-reference
Individual and household interactions with energy systems: toward integrated understanding
10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.003 · doi-reference
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · doi-reference
Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01897.x · doi-reference
Risk communication and natural hazard mitigations: how trust influences its effectiveness
10.1504/ijgenvi.2008.017256 · doi-reference
The risk perception paradox – implications for governance and communication for natural hazards
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x · doi-reference
A cross-cultural study of perceived benefit versus risk as mediators in the trust-acceptance relationship
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01637.x · doi-reference
Understanding uncertainty
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00284.x · doi-reference
Public meetings and risk amplification: a longitudinal study
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00399.x · doi-reference
Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants
10.1093/poq/nfp041 · doi-reference
American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous?
10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x · doi-reference
Rating the risks
10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091 · doi-reference
The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x · doi-reference
Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00543.x · doi-reference
Perceived risk, trust and democracy
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x · doi-reference
Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00551.x · doi-reference