Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Open public full textRights: UNKNOWN · https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Julian Sagebiel, Jakob R. Müller, Jens Rommel
Abstract
Rights: UNKNOWN · https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust
2014 · 0 citations
The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
2014 · 0 citations
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
2014 · 0 citations
Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding
2014 · 0 citations
Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism
2014 · 0 citations
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Local utilities in the German electricity market and their role in the diffusion of innovations in energy efficiency and climate change mitigation
10.1007/978-3-7908-2730-9_1 · 2012
Unresolved referenced work
2010
Kooperation in der Energiewirtschaft: Chancen und Grenzen der Rechtsform eG
10.1515/zfgg-2009-0210 · 2009
Genossenschaftliche Lösungsansätze zur Sicherung der kommunalen Daseinsvorsorge
10.1515/zfgg-2010-0102 · 2010
Unresolved referenced work
2010
Unresolved referenced work
2010
Is there a future role for urban electricity cooperatives? The case of Greenpeace Energy
2011
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
1985
Unresolved referenced work
1996
Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences: A contemporary examination
2014 · 0 citations
The emerging field of energy transitions: progress,challenges, and opportunities
10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002 · 2014
The German energy transition as a regime shift
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019 · 2014
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · 2014
Energy policy and research: the underappreciation of trust
10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004 · 2014
Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure:scale, decentralization and polycentrism
10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009 · 2014
Individual and household interactions with energy system: toward integrated understanding
10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.003 · 2014
Carbon lock-out: advancing renewable energy policy in Europe
10.3390/en5020323 · 2012
Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.061 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.011 · 2008
Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035 · 2006
US consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity
10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00006-4 · 2001
Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish region
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.028 · 2012
Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: a choice experiment study
10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.013 · 2010
Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.12.007 · 2014
The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.006 · 2008
Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009 · 2007
Landscape externalities from onshore wind power
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.055 · 2010
Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.002 · 2009
Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023 · 2007
Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain
10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00063-5 · 2002
Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies
10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004 · 2010
External benefits of biomass-e in Spain: an economic valuation
10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.086 · 2010
Social demand for electricity from forest biomass in Spain: does payment periodicity affect the willingness to pay?
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.002 · 2009
Homeowners’ preferences for adopting innovative residential heating systems: a discrete choice analysis for Germany
10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.009 · 2012
Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.026 · 2011
The market for “Lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism
10.2307/1879431 · 1970
Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · 1976
A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures
10.1002/hec.1197 · doi-reference
Field experiments
10.1257/0022051043004577 · doi-reference
Experimental subjects are not different
10.1038/srep01213 · doi-reference
Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples
10.1007/s10683-012-9327-7 · doi-reference
Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes
10.1007/s10640-005-7686-7 · doi-reference
Do respondents perception of the status quo matter in non-market valuation with choice experiments? An application to New Zealand freshwater streams
10.3390/su3091593 · doi-reference
Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.021 · doi-reference
The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach
10.2307/1243338 · doi-reference
Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations
10.1002/hec.1739 · doi-reference
Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003 · doi-reference
Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model
10.1080/00036846.2011.650325 · doi-reference
Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models?
10.1007/s11116-012-9394-9 · doi-reference
The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity
10.1287/mksc.1090.0508 · doi-reference
A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation
10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z · doi-reference
Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay
10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.012 · doi-reference
Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data
10.2307/3151440 · doi-reference
The structure of random utility models
10.1007/bf00133443 · doi-reference
A law of comparative judgment
10.1037/h0070288 · doi-reference
Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition
10.1086/260169 · doi-reference
A new approach to consumer theory
10.1086/259131 · doi-reference
Coping with power scarcity in an emerging megacity: a consumers’ perspective from Hyderabad
10.1504/ijgei.2010.036956 · doi-reference
Contract farming configuration: smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes
10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.002 · doi-reference
Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.002 · doi-reference
The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited
10.2307/202051 · doi-reference
The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective
10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x · doi-reference
Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives
10.2307/2393356 · doi-reference
The problem of social cost
10.1086/466560 · doi-reference
The nature of the firm
10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · doi-reference
Control rights, governance, and the costs of ownership in agricultural cooperatives
10.1002/agr.21328 · doi-reference
Die Genossenschaft der Zukunft aus Sicht des Verbandes
10.1515/zfgg-2009-0203 · doi-reference