Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Gillian Tully, Neil Cohen, David Compton, Gareth Davies, Roy Isbell, Tim Watson
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Cutting corners: trading Justice for cost savings
10.1016/j.diin.2006.10.006 · 2006
Differentiating the phases of digital investigations
10.1016/j.diin.2016.11.001 · 2016
The checkered past and risky future of digital forensics
10.1080/00450618.2018.1554090 · 2019
Making sense of digital forensic standards
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2009
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Rethinking digital forensics
10.33166/aetic.2019.02.005 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Requirement in digital forensics method definition; observations from a UK study
10.1016/j.diin.2018.09.004 · 2018
A review of quality procedures in the UK forensic sciences: what can the field of digital forensics learn?
10.1016/j.scijus.2018.09.006 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Accrediting digital forensics: what are the choices?
10.1016/j.diin.2018.04.004 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Commentary on: Hak. Evaluation of the Forensic Science Regulator's recommendations regarding image comparison evidence
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Forensic science, reliability and scientific validity: advice from America
2017
No additional external references are available.