Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Jessica Poon, Jae‐Hyun Lee, Chu‐Chi Huang, Apissada Jindarojanakul, Diana López, Sang J. Lee, Jason D. Lee
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an updated systematic review
2021
Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review
10.1111/jopr.12527 · 2018
Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.14094 · 2026
Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 · 2018
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
10.1111/clr.12994 · 2017
Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: a prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae
10.1111/jopr.13162 · 2020
An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques
10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60370-4 · 2013
Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.13211 · 2020
Three-dimensional accuracy of conventional versus digital complete arch implant impressions
10.1111/jopr.13264 · 2021
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: an in vitro study?
10.1111/clr.13890 · 2022
A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach
10.1111/jopr.12362 · 2017
Effect of scan body designs and internal conical angles on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant digital scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.008 · 2024
Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13774 · 2023
Intraoral digital implant scans: parameters to improve accuracy
10.1111/jopr.13749 · 2023
Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study
10.1111/jopr.13131 · 2020
Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.012 · 2020
Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch
10.11607/jomi.6855 · 2019
Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.018 · 2019
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008 · 2024
Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: a crossover randomized trial
10.1111/cid.13336 · 2024
Tolerances in the production of six different implant scanbodies: a comparative study
10.11607/ijp.7379 · 2021
In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: the effect of implant angulation
10.11607/jomi.5087 · 2017
Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: a systematic review
2021
Continuous scan strategy (CSS): a novel technique to improve the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions
2020
Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.018 · 2023
Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 · 2020
Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners
10.11607/jomi.9248 · 2022
Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system
10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5 · 2015
Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 · 2019
Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13345 · 2021
Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037 · 2022
Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation
10.11607/ijp.5535 · 2018
Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.12853 · 2017
Immediate implant placement, immediate load with same-day fully digital fabrication of a screw-retained provisional implant prosthesis
2023
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072 · 2022
Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1111/clr.13598 · 2020
Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.13549 · 2019
Evaluating the impact of scan body angulation and geometric attachments on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions: a comparison of two intraoral scanners
10.1111/jopr.13807 · 2025
Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: a dental technique
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008 · 2019
Enhancing scanning accuracy of digital implant scans: a systematic review on application methods of scan bodies
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.010 · 2024
Contemporary applications of robotic systems in dental implantology: a review
10.1016/j.identj.2025.109335 · doi-reference
Reverse scan body: a retrospective clinical study with 30 edentulous jaws
10.1111/jopr.70055 · doi-reference
Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body
10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_21_00328 · doi-reference
Reverse impression technique: a fully digital protocol for the fabrication of the definitive fixed prosthesis for completely edentulous patients
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.015 · doi-reference
Reverse scan body: the scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses
10.1111/jopr.13772 · doi-reference
Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13751 · doi-reference
Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.017 · doi-reference
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005 · doi-reference
Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a technique
10.1002/cap.10269 · doi-reference
Maxillary full-arch immediately loaded implant-supported fixed prosthesis designed and produced by photogrammetry and digital printing: a clinical report
10.1111/jopr.12364 · doi-reference
Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3 · doi-reference
Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: time and patient satisfaction
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017 · doi-reference
In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104391 · doi-reference
The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
10.1111/cid.12919 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012 · doi-reference
Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.015 · doi-reference
Enhancing Precision and efficiency in fabricating complete arch screw-retained implant prosthesis: a clinical case report utilizing the nexus iOS scan gauge system
10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00019 · doi-reference
Use of a dual-purpose implant scan body to obtain both digital and analog records for complete arch fixed implant restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.003 · doi-reference
Full-arch restoration with the NEXUS IOS(R) system: a retrospective clinical evaluation of 37 restorations after a one year of follow-up
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104741 · doi-reference
Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104095 · doi-reference
Digital workflow for double complete arch zirconia prostheses utilizing a novel scan body
10.1111/jopr.13417 · doi-reference
Guided implant scanning: a procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.022 · doi-reference
Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: a pilot clinical trial
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.024 · doi-reference
Enhancing scanning accuracy of digital implant scans: a systematic review on application methods of scan bodies
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.010 · doi-reference
Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: a dental technique
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008 · doi-reference
Evaluating the impact of scan body angulation and geometric attachments on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions: a comparison of two intraoral scanners
10.1111/jopr.13807 · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.13549 · doi-reference
Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103476 · doi-reference
Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1111/clr.13598 · doi-reference
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072 · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.12853 · doi-reference
Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation
10.11607/ijp.5535 · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037 · doi-reference
Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13345 · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 · doi-reference
Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system
10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5 · doi-reference
Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners
10.11607/jomi.9248 · doi-reference
Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 · doi-reference
Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.018 · doi-reference
In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: the effect of implant angulation
10.11607/jomi.5087 · doi-reference