Assessing absolute sustainability: An analysis of impact assessment tools

Scientifically assess impacts of sustainable investments

10.1126/science.aao3895 · doi-reference

Measuring companies' environmental and social impacts: an analysis of ESG ratings and SDG scores

10.1177/10860266251326895 · doi-reference

A taxonomy of climate accounting principles for financial portfolios

10.3390/su10020328 · doi-reference

Missing the impact in impact investing research – a systematic review and critical reflection of the literature

10.1111/joms.12978 · doi-reference

Measuring the Doughnut: a good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries

10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447 · doi-reference

Development of a life-cycle impact assessment methodology linked to the Planetary Boundaries framework

10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.065 · doi-reference

How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: an industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.075 · doi-reference

Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments – a review

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123287 · doi-reference

A safe operating space for humanity

10.1038/461472a · doi-reference

Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: a critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance

10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128016 · doi-reference

Investigating methodological aspects of absolute environmental sustainability assessment based on planetary boundaries

10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108154 · doi-reference

Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: a critical review

10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169 · doi-reference

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

10.1136/bmj.n71 · doi-reference

Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment: a critical review

10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126120 · doi-reference

A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business

10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · doi-reference

W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting

10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · doi-reference

Companies' ESG performance under soft and hard regulation environment

10.1007/s43621-025-01657-0 · doi-reference

Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017 · doi-reference

The role of planetary boundaries in assessing absolute environmental sustainability across scales

10.1016/j.envint.2021.106475 · doi-reference

Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact

10.1177/1086026620919202 · doi-reference

Does voluntary ESG reporting resolve disagreement among ESG rating agencies?

10.1080/09638180.2022.2088588 · doi-reference

Defining and conceptualizing impact investing: attractive nuisance or catalyst?

10.1007/s10551-022-05157-3 · doi-reference

Sharing the safe operating space: exploring ethical allocation principles to operationalize the planetary boundaries and assess absolute sustainability at individual and industrial sector levels

10.1111/jiec.13050 · doi-reference

Allocation and characterisation factors for absolute environmental sustainability assessment

10.1038/s41597-026-07797-w · doi-reference

Methodological framework to find links between life cycle sustainability assessment categories and the UN Sustainable Development Goals based on literature

10.1111/jiec.13283 · doi-reference

Life cycle assessment‐based Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment is also relative

10.1111/jiec.13260 · doi-reference

A double-edged sword: materiality classifications of sustainability topics

10.1007/s11142-025-09908-1 · doi-reference

The why and how of assigning responsibility for supply chain emissions

10.1038/s41558-022-01543-x · doi-reference

When to use what: methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators

10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068 · doi-reference

A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 · doi-reference

Applying environmental sustainability boundaries for climate change in life cycle assessment: a review of approaches and implications for policymaking

10.1111/jiec.13481 · doi-reference

Principles for impact investments: practical guidance for impact measurement, assessment and valuation

10.1007/s43546-025-00796-w · doi-reference

Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries

10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 · doi-reference

Assessing company sustainability impact: status quo and way ahead

10.1111/jiec.70065 · doi-reference

What does it really mean to be a strongly sustainable company? – a response to Nikolaou and Tsalis

10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.268 · doi-reference

A framework for development and communication of absolute environmental sustainability assessment methods

10.1111/jiec.12820 · doi-reference

Beyond net zero climate targets: a research agenda for absolute environmental sustainability assessment to support decisions at different scales

10.1088/1748-9326/ae3dfa · doi-reference

The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: a critical appraisal of approaches to define a “Safe Operating Space” for humanity

10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337 · doi-reference

Aggregate confusion: the divergence of ESG ratings

10.1093/rof/rfac033 · doi-reference

“In partnership for the goals”? The level of agreement between SDG ratings

10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.014 · doi-reference