Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Kyung Lok Do, Soo-A Do, Ui Hyun Kong, In Seon Son, Hong-Bum Sohn, Byoung-Moo Seo, Sung Bin Youn
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 · 2020
A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser
10.1371/journal.pone.0149625 · 2016
Accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery
10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.023 · 2018
Accuracy of mandibular proximal segment position using virtual surgical planning and custom osteosynthesis plates
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.002 · 2022
Stability of proximal mandibular anatomical structures following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.006 · 2024
Evaluation of condylar resorption before and after orthognathic surgery
10.1053/j.sodo.2012.11.006 · 2013
Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study
10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027 · 2013
Three-dimensional changes in the mandibular proximal segment after using a surgery-first approach in patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry
10.1097/scs.0000000000008520 · 2022
Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusions
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.031 · 2014
Surgical stability after proximal segment angle alteration in patients with Class III facial asymmetry
10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.002 · 2023
Accuracy between virtual surgical planning and actual outcomes in orthognathic surgery by iterative closest point algorithm and color maps: a retrospective cohort study. Med. Oral Patol
2019
Reliability statistics every orthodontist should know
10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.004 · 2024
Virtually planned orthognathic surgery achieves an accurate condylar position
10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.048 · 2021
Does artificial intelligence predict orthognathic surgical outcomes better than conventional linear regression methods?
10.2319/111423-756.1 · 2024
Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning
10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.012 · 2018
Correction of a severe facial asymmetry with computerized planning and with the use of a rapid prototyped surgical template: a case report/technique article
10.1186/1746-160x-10-27 · 2014
Three-dimensional planning accuracy and follow-up protocol in orthognathic surgery: a validation study
10.1016/j.ijom.2018.07.011 · 2019
Surgical accuracy in inferior maxillary reposition
10.1016/j.joms.2018.05.022 · 2018
Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular proximal segment, condyle and coronoid process after orthognathic surgery
2026
Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning
10.1111/ocr.12262 · 2019
New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction
10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.057 · 2009
Three-dimensional evaluation of proximal segment positional changes and postoperative stability in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using the novel index Co–B distance
2026
Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery
10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.021 · 2013
Does the sequence of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery affect accuracy in skeletal Class III patients?
10.1016/j.joms.2024.07.013 · 2024
Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in two-jaw orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual results
10.1016/j.oooo.2016.03.004 · 2016
No additional external references are available.