Willing to pay for security: A discrete choice experiment to analyse labour supply preferences

An introduction to maximum entropy and minimum cross-entropy estimation using stata

10.1177/1536867x1001000301 · doi-reference

Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender

10.1093/qje/qjx035 · doi-reference

Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level

10.1162/003465398557735 · doi-reference

The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care

10.1257/jep.8.4.3 · doi-reference

Unemployment risk and wage differentials

10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.019 · doi-reference

Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3 · doi-reference

Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk

10.1017/s1930297500002205 · doi-reference

Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments

10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004 · doi-reference

Negative aspects of temporary employment

10.1007/bf02685800 · doi-reference

Hypothetical bias reconsidered: Payment and provision uncertainties in a threshold provision mechanism

10.1007/s10640-013-9741-0 · doi-reference

Identifying careless responses in survey data

10.1037/a0028085 · doi-reference

Valuing alternative work arrangements

10.1257/aer.20161500 · doi-reference

Non-wage amenities

10.1016/bs.heslab.2025.07.002 · doi-reference

The value of working conditions in the United States and implications for the structure of wages

10.1257/aer.20190846 · doi-reference

What’s to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies?

10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00675.x · doi-reference

Why is flexible employment increasing?

10.1007/bf02685798 · doi-reference

Using ex ante approaches to obtain credible signals for value in contingent markets: evidence from the field

10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01017.x · doi-reference

The role of unemployment in the rise in alternative work arrangements

10.1257/aer.p20171092 · doi-reference

Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work

10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.341 · doi-reference

Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias

10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · doi-reference

Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment

10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1 · doi-reference

Health effects of job insecurity

10.15185/izawol.212.v2 · doi-reference

Wages or fringes? Some evidence on trade-offs and sorting

10.1086/676662 · doi-reference

Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?

10.1257/aer.100.3.1238 · doi-reference

Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field

10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · doi-reference

Zero-hours contracts and labour market policy

10.1093/epolic/eiz008 · doi-reference

Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates

10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006 · doi-reference

Incentive and informational properties of preference questions

10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5 · doi-reference

Temporary jobs: stepping stones or dead ends?

10.1111/1468-0297.00043 · doi-reference

Solo self-employment and alternative work arrangements: a cross-country perspective on the changing composition of jobs

10.1257/jep.34.1.170 · doi-reference

Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment

10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.40202-36.x · doi-reference

Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: evidence from a field experiment

10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02106.x · doi-reference

Identifying the random responder

10.1080/00223980.1989.10542966 · doi-reference