Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Xinlei Hu, M. Francisca Lima
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
On environmental preference: Applying conjoint analysis to visiting parks and buying houses
2010
Perceptions of park visitors on access to urban parks and benefits of green spaces
10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126959 · 2021
Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation
10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006 · 2006
The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 · 2014
Exploring perceptions towards biodiversity conservation in urban parks: Insights on acceptability and design attributes
10.1016/j.jum.2024.05.006 · 2024
Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038 · 2004
Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness
10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 · 2012
The effect of spontaneous wild vegetation on landscape preferences in urban green spaces
2023
Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001 · 2018
Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe
10.1111/conl.12718 · 2020
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity
10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · 2007
The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · 2007
What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks
10.5751/es-12598-260325 · 2021
The role of urban green space in promoting health and well-being is related to nature connectedness and biodiversity: Evidence from a two-factor mixed-design experiment
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105020 · 2024
Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents
10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001 · 2012
All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 · 2017
“Not in their front yard” The opportunities and challenges of introducing perennial urban meadows: A local authority stakeholder perspective
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.009 · 2017
Perceptions of urban rewilding in a park with secondary succession vegetation growth on lake silt: Landscape preferences and perceived species richness
10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648 · 2025
The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153 · 2024
Exploring preferences for biodiversity and wild parks in chinese cities: A conjoint analysis study in Hangzhou
10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127595 · 2022
It’s ok to be wilder: Preference for natural growth in urban green spaces in a tropical city
10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.005 · 2019
Integrating Biodiversity in Urban Planning and Design Processes. Book of abstracts of the 7th International Conference of the Network URBIO – Urban Biodiversity & Design
2023
Floristic investigations of historical parks in St. Petersburg, Russia
2004
The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes
10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161 · 2016
Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest
10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.009 · 2014
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
1989
Unresolved referenced work
1993
How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors’ positive emotions?
2022
Urban wilderness: Supply, demand, and access
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.017 · 2018
Pro-environmental behaviour, connectedness with nature, and the endorsement of pro-environmental norms in youth: Longitudinal relations
10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102256 · 2024
The relationship between landscape design style and the conservation value of parks: A case study of a historical park in Weimar
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.006 · 2012
Cues to care: A systematic analytical review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821 · 2020
The relationships among biodiversity, perceived biodiversity and recreational preference in urban green spaces–a case study in Xianyang, China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109916 · 2023
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Unresolved referenced work
2020
The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · 2010
Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden?
10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011 · 2013
Why is dense vegetation in city parks unpopular? the mediative role of sense of privacy and safety
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126988 · 2021
Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities
10.3390/environments5020023 · 2018
Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006 · doi-reference
The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China
10.1186/s40657-020-00234-5 · doi-reference
The heterogeneous preferences for conservation and management in urban wetland parks: A case study from China
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127064 · doi-reference
Public perceptions and preferences regarding lawns and their alternatives in China: A case study of Xi’an
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126478 · doi-reference
What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104254 · doi-reference
Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011 · doi-reference
Wild or neat? personal traits affect public preference for wildness of urban lakeshores in France and China
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105190 · doi-reference
Recognising the fourth Nature: A case study of spontaneous urban vegetation in Southwest Australian cities
10.3390/land14030467 · doi-reference
Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 · doi-reference
Barriers and opportunities of combining social and ecological functions of urban greenspaces – users’ and landscape professionals’ perspectives
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.007 · doi-reference
Important park features for encouraging park visitation, physical activity and social interaction among adolescents: A conjoint analysis
10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102617 · doi-reference
The green care code: How nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro-nature conservation behaviours
10.1002/pan3.10117 · doi-reference
Is biodiversity attractive?-On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007 · doi-reference
Measuring what people value: A comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys
10.1111/1475-6773.01116 · doi-reference
Understanding the relative importance of micro-level design characteristics of walking paths in parks to promote walking among older adults
10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128129 · doi-reference
What do people value in urban green? linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices
10.5751/es-12204-260128 · doi-reference
Attitudes of landscape professionals towards naturalistic versus formal urban landscapes in the UK
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.002 · doi-reference
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016 · doi-reference
Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence
10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1 · doi-reference
Messy ecosystems, orderly frames
10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · doi-reference
10.1002/9781444318654
10.1002/9781444318654 · doi-reference
URBIO: An introduction to the international network in urban biodiversity and design
10.1007/s11355-010-0139-7 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10 · doi-reference
Nature on our doorstep: How do residents perceive urban parks vs. biodiverse areas?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105059 · doi-reference
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature
10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · doi-reference