Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Thanh Liem Dinh
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
2023
Investigating individual differences with qualitative research methods: Results of a meta-analysis of leading applied linguistics journals
10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.6 · 2022
Promise and feasibility of teaching expository text structure: A primary grade pilot study
10.1007/s11145-017-9769-6 · 2018
Argumentative features of international English language testing system (IELTS) essays: A rhetorical analysis on successful exam essays
10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4768 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
1995
Unresolved referenced work
2007
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Developing a persuasive writing model for secondary school
10.1007/s10671-019-09253-6 · 2020
Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment
10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 · 2010
Methodological status and trends in expository text structure instruction efficacy research
2015
Using thematic analysis in psychology
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · 2006
Developing confident writers: Fostering audience awareness in primary school writing classrooms
2020
Scaffolding Chinese as a second language writing through a systemic functional linguistics approach
10.1016/j.system.2017.11.003 · 2018
Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education
10.1371/journal.pone.0036791 · 2012
Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English
2007
Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: The role of argument in IELTS tests
10.1016/j.jeap.2003.11.002 · 2004
Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation
2006
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL
10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001 · 2005
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Joint construction in the SLATE project
10.1558/lhs.v7i1-3.77 · 2011
Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia
10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182 · 2015
10.2307/3586587
10.2307/3586587
The role of evidence in argumentative writing
10.1080/105735699278305 · 1999
Unresolved referenced work
1978
A study of the rhetorical features and the argument structure of EAP essays by L1 and L2 students in the UAE
10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.28.699 · 2020
Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology
1987
The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing
10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001 · 2006
Learning to write: Issues in theory, research, and pedagogy
2011
Unresolved referenced work
1998
Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest
10.1017/s0261444807004892 · 2008
Making words count: The value of qualitative research
10.1002/pri.312 · 2004
Korean EFL students’ argumentative writing in L1 and L2: A comparative move analysis study
2020
Culture and argumentative writing in world English
1997
Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education
10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x · 1966
Using evidence in L2 argumentative writing: A longitudinal case study across high school and university
10.1111/lang.12198 · 2017
An Investigation of Japanese and English L1 essay organization: Differences and similarities
10.3138/cmlr.54.4.475 · 1998
Unresolved referenced work
2005
The role of tutoring in problem solving
10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · doi-reference
Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation
10.1177/0741088309333019 · doi-reference
Argumentation across the curriculum
10.1177/0741088311399236 · doi-reference
Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 · doi-reference
Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment
10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.004 · doi-reference
Tracing the culture behind writing: Rhetorical patterns and bidirectional transfer in L1 and L2 essays of Turkish writers in relation to educational context
10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.003 · doi-reference
Structuring written arguments in primary and secondary school: A systemic functional linguistics perspective
10.1016/j.linged.2022.101120 · doi-reference
Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance
10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006 · doi-reference
Changes to teachers’ knowledge base: Do they make a difference to students’ writing outcomes?
10.1075/aral.18025.shi · doi-reference
Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions
10.1002/sce.20276 · doi-reference
Argument-Counterargument structure in Indonesian EFL learners' English argumentative essays: A dialogic concept of writing
10.1177/0033688215587607 · doi-reference
The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing
10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012 · doi-reference
Applying the Toulmin model in teaching L2 argumentative writing
10.66887/jltl.v3i2.109 · doi-reference
Promoting Argument-Counterargument integration in students' writing
10.3200/jexe.76.1.59-92 · doi-reference
The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing
10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157 · doi-reference
Adopting an SFL approach to teaching L2 writing through the Teaching Learning Cycle
10.5539/elt.v13n6p64 · doi-reference
Applying Toulmin: Does peer response play a role in Korean EFL college students' revision quality?
10.15858/engtea.69.3.201409.3 · doi-reference
Using genre-based pedagogy to teach structural staging of short persuasive essays in a Japanese university context
10.56498/422262022 · doi-reference
Dimensions of difference: A comparison of university writing and IELTS writing
10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001 · doi-reference
The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students
10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9 · doi-reference
Genre identification based on SFL principles: The representation of text types and genres in English language teaching material
10.1007/s41701-017-0013-z · doi-reference
Say more and be more coherent: How text elaboration and cohesion can increase writing quality
10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.02 · doi-reference
Argument relevance and structure. Assessing and developing students’ uses of evidence
10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.002 · doi-reference
Argument structures in Chinese university students’ argumentative writing: A contrastive study
10.1075/etc.8.1.03liu · doi-reference
Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test
10.1016/j.system.2014.05.005 · doi-reference
Argument structure as an interactive resource by undergraduate students
10.1558/lhs.v9i3.277 · doi-reference
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
10.2307/2529310 · doi-reference