Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureRita Elaine Silver, Evangeline Lin, Baoqi Sun
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Violation of publication ethics: A growing concern for journal editors
2017
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
The publication of ethically uncertain research: Attitudes and practices of journal editors
10.1186/1472-6939-13-4 · 2012
A ‘Thankless Task’? My work as a book review editor
10.3138/jsp.53.2.01 · 2022
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Research ethics in a changing social sciences landscape
10.1177/17470161221141011 · 2022
The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: Disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes
10.1177/17470161221147202 · 2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL
10.2307/3588471 · 2003
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
10.24318/jtbg8ihl
10.24318/jtbg8ihl
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions
10.1093/scipol/scac059 · 2023
Online review of manuscripts: More haste, less speed?
10.3138/jsp.40.4.440 · 2009
10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706
10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706
Paper-mill detector put to the test in push to stamp out fake science
10.1038/d41586-022-04245-8 · 2022
Unresolved referenced work
2021
Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressure to publish, affect scientific integrity
10.1371/journal.pone.0127556 · 2015
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
10.1073/pnas.1212247109 · 2012
Editor as good steward of manuscript submissions: 'Culture,' tone, and procedures
2004
Preserving the integrity of citations and references by all stakeholders of science communication
10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545 · 2015
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Approving or improving research ethics in management journals
10.1007/s10551-015-2564-x · 2016
Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined
10.1186/s13104-022-06169-y · 2022
The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
10.1080/08989621.2020.1721288 · 2020
10.1177/0267658319877433
10.1177/0267658319877433
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics
10.1111/modl.12760 · 2022
10.1017/s0261444823000010
10.1017/s0261444823000010 · doi-reference
Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis
10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206 · doi-reference
Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey
10.1136/jme.2008.028324 · doi-reference
A reality check on publishing integrity tools in biomedical science
10.1007/s10067-021-05668-w · doi-reference
When are researchers willing to share their data? Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia
10.1371/journal.pone.0234172 · doi-reference
Strengthening research integrity: Which topic areas should organisations focus on?
10.1057/s41599-021-00874-y · doi-reference
Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE)
10.1007/s11192-022-04400-y · doi-reference
10.1186/s12910-019-0410-x
10.1186/s12910-019-0410-x · doi-reference
Publication bias is the consequence of a lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.049 · doi-reference
The Singapore statement on research integrity
10.1080/08989621.2011.557296 · doi-reference
Exploring the gray area: Similarities and differences in questionable research practices (QRPs) across main areas of research
10.1007/s11948-021-00310-z · doi-reference
Image manipulation as research misconduct
10.1007/s11948-008-9108-z · doi-reference
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals
10.1002/leap.1485 · doi-reference
A survey of social science journal editors for behind-the-scenes data on the publication process
10.3138/jsp.47.3.231 · doi-reference
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737 · doi-reference
International engagement or local commitment? Investigating the publication practices of Chinese returnee scholars in the humanities and social sciences
10.3138/jsp-2022-0014 · doi-reference
10.1002/tesq.288
10.1002/tesq.288 · doi-reference
10.31219/osf.io/kuf26
10.31219/osf.io/kuf26 · doi-reference
Dealing with inappropriate-, low-quality-, and other forms of challenging peer review, including hostile referees and inflammatory or confusing critiques: Prevention and treatment
10.1080/08989621.2020.1815010 · doi-reference
Research integrity, image manipulation, and anonymizing photographs in visual social science research
10.1080/13645579.2012.759333 · doi-reference
10.4135/9781473910096
10.4135/9781473910096 · doi-reference