Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Open public full textRights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Tove Larsson, Luke Plonsky, Scott Sterling, Merja Kytö, Katherine Yaw, Margaret Wood
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Abstract
Rights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Applied linguistics journal editor perspectives: Research ethics and academic publishing
2023 · 0 citations
Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing
2023 · 0 citations
“Significance sells”: Applied linguists’ views on questionable research practices
2024 · 0 citations
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Questionable research practices among Italian research psychologists
10.1371/journal.pone.0172792 · 2017
Researchers on research integrity: A survey of European and American researchers
2022
Sampling bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics
10.1017/s0267190520000033 · 2020
Ethical shades of gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable practices in health professions education
10.1097/acm.0000000000002412 · 2019
Questionable and open research practices: Attitudes and perceptions among quantitative communication researchers
10.1093/joc/jqab031 · 2021
What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences
10.1098/rsos.200048 · 2022
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5 · 2016
Psychotherapy researchers: Reported misbehaviors and opinions
10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25 · 2012
Questionable research practices and open science in quantitative criminology
2021
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Questionable research practices revisited
10.1177/1948550615612150 · 2016
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
10.1371/journal.pone.0200303 · 2018
10.1017/s0261444819000430
10.1017/s0261444819000430
Missing data management practices in L2 research: The good, the bad and the ugly
2019
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands
10.1371/journal.pone.0263023 · 2022
Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research
10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.006 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Research integrity among PhD students at the Faculty of Medicine: A comparison of three Scandinavian universities
10.1177/1556264620929230 · 2020
Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior
10.1080/08989621.2018.1485493 · 2018
The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus
2007
Unresolved referenced work
2021
Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics
10.1111/modl.12760 · 2022
Development and COI disclosure in high-stakes English proficiency test validation research: A systematic review
10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100060 · 2023
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling
10.1177/0956797611430953 · 2012
Survey on the Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices of Medical Students, PhD Students, and Supervisors at the Zagreb School of Medicine in Croatia
10.1177/15562646211033727 · 2021
Both questionable and open research practices are prevalent in education research
10.3102/0013189x211001356 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Outliers in L2 research in applied linguistics: A synthesis and data re-analysis
10.1017/s0267190520000057 · 2020
Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform
10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x · 2014
How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research
10.1111/lang.12079 · 2014
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison
10.1002/ijop.12632 · 2020
Exploring the gray area: Similarities and differences in questionable research practices (QRPs) across main areas of research
10.1007/s11948-021-00310-z · 2021
Different aspects of scientific misconduct among Iranian academic members
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2007
Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research
10.1016/j.system.2017.08.010 · 2017
Introducing and illustrating the Delphi method for applied linguistics research
10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100040 · 2023
Questionable research practices among faculty and students in APA-accredited clinical and counseling psychology doctoral programs
10.1037/tep0000322 · 2022
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists
10.1177/1556264614552421 · 2014
Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1007/s11948-021-00314-9 · doi-reference