Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureDaniel R. Isbell
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices
2023 · 0 citations
“Significance sells”: Applied linguists’ views on questionable research practices
2024 · 0 citations
What's ethics got to do with applied linguistics? Revisiting the past, considering the present, and being optimistic about the future of our field
2024 · 0 citations
Ethics in applied linguistics research: Evidence and action
2024 · 0 citations
Unresolved referenced work
2019
11. The micropolitics of research and publication
2009
Code of ethics: American educational research association
2011
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report
10.1037/amp0000191 · 2018
Ethical shades of gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education
10.1097/acm.0000000000002412 · 2019
The vexing problem of validity and the future of second language assessment
10.1177/02655322221125204 · 2023
To be scientific is to be communist
2023
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2021
The use of TOEFL iBT in admissions decisions: Stakeholder perceptions
2022
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Assessing speaking proficiency: A narrative review of speaking assessment research within the argument-based validation framework
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00330 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research
10.1017/s0261444819000430 · 2021
10.1002/ets2.12037
10.1002/ets2.12037 · 2014
Using an innovative standard-setting approach to align integrated and independent writing tasks to the CEFR
10.1080/15434303.2020.1754828 · 2020
Factor structure of the Test of English for Academic Purposes (TEAP®) test in relation to the TOEFL iBT® test
10.1186/s40468-016-0025-9 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics
2022
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
10.1111/jedm.12000 · 2013
Vereniging Hogescholen, & VSNU
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Introducing registered reports at Language Learning: Promoting transparency, replication, and a synthetic ethic in the language sciences
10.1111/lang.12284 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
1995
The preregistration revolution
10.1073/pnas.1708274114 · 2018
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021
Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research
10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x · 2011
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Investigating the value of section scores for the TOEFL iBT ® test
10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02342.x · 2013
Do the TOEFL iBT ® section scores provide value-added information to stakeholders?
10.1177/0265532217716731 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
2019
TOEIC® Writing test scores as indicators of the functional adequacy of writing in the international workplace: Evaluation by linguistic laypersons
10.1016/j.asw.2020.100492 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
2001
If facts were not untruths, their implications were: Sponsorship bias and misleading communication
10.1353/ken.2018.0011 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
2007
Understanding financial conflicts of interest
10.1056/nejm199308193290812 · 1993
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists
10.1177/1556264614552421 · 2014
Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance
10.1177/0265532212456968 · doi-reference
The relationship between raters’ prior language study and the evaluation of foreign language speech samples
10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02266.x · doi-reference