Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Tim Stoeckel, Tomoko Ishii, Young Ae Kim, Hung Tan Ha, Nam Thi Phuong Ho, Stuart McLean
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
An investigation into the roles of guessing and partial knowledge in the vocabulary size test
10.55593/ej.26103a15 · 2022
Variations in format and willingness to skip items in a multiple-choice vocabulary test
2012
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Cocron: A web interface and R package for the statistical comparison of Cronbach's alpha coefficients
2016
Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0265532212459028 · 2012
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Using confidence intervals to determine adequate item sample sizes for vocabulary tests: An essential but overlooked practice
10.1177/0265532220979562 · 2021
Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: Issues with guessing and sampling rates
10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl · 2015
A study of the effects of contextualization and familiarization on responses to the TOEFL vocabulary test items
1991
A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure
1979
Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension
2000
Challenges in the assumptions of using a flemma-based word counting unit
10.7820/vli.v10.1.ishii · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
2023
L2 Reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis
10.1111/lang.12034 · 2014
The development and validation of a bilingual version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0033688212439359 · 2012
Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners’ ability to employ words?
10.1080/15434303.2016.1237516 · 2016
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
10.2307/2529310 · 1977
What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension?
1989
Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?
2023
Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness
10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x · 2004
How well do learners know derived words? The effect of proficiency, word frequency and type of affix
10.1075/itl.20020.lau · 2021
Test taking and DK use on the vocabulary size test
10.7820/vli.v03.2.lucovich · 2014
A proposed taxonomy of test-taking action and item format in written receptive vocabulary testing
10.7820/vli.v11.1.martin · 2022
The potential impact of guessing on monolingual and bilingual versions of the vocabulary size test
2015
Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit
10.1093/applin/amw050 · 2018
The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized
10.64152/10125/67396 · 2021
An edited version of the first eight 1,000-word frequency bands of the Japanese-English version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.37546/jalttlt40.4-1 · 2016
An empirical examination of the effect of guessing on vocabulary size test scores
10.7820/vli.v04.1.mclean.et.al · 2015
The internal consistency and accuracy of automatically scored written receptive meaning-recall data: A preliminary study
10.7820/vli.v10.2.mclean · 2021
Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach
10.1177/0265532219898380 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
1992
How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?
10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 · 2006
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Unresolved referenced work
2011
The four strands
10.2167/illt039.0 · 2007
Which words do you need?
2015
A bilingual Vocabulary Size Test of English for Vietnamese learners
10.1177/0033688210390264 · 2011
Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines
2020
Validation of the Mandarin version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0033688216639761 · doi-reference
The I don't know option in the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1002/tesq.98 · doi-reference
The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis
10.1177/1362168820913998 · doi-reference
The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT
10.1075/itl.168.1.02web · doi-reference
A different perspective on the limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge
10.1017/s0272263121000449 · doi-reference
Comparing effects of two types of vocabulary knowledge on six question types in reading tests among Japanese EFL learners
10.20622/jltaj.12.0_104 · doi-reference
A serial multiple-choice format designed to reduce overestimation of meaning-recall knowledge on the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1002/tesq.429 · doi-reference
Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge
10.1017/s027226312000025x · doi-reference
Is the lemma more appropriate than the flemma as a word counting unit?
10.1093/applin/amy059 · doi-reference
Is “I don't know” a viable answer choice on the Vocabulary Size Test?
10.1002/tesq.325 · doi-reference
What the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to Webb
10.1017/s0272263121000437 · doi-reference
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
10.1177/026553220101800103 · doi-reference
Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation
10.1017/s0261444819000326 · doi-reference
The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension
10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x · doi-reference
From single words to passages: Contextual effects on predictive power of vocabulary measures for assessing reading performance
10.1080/15434300701776138 · doi-reference
Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective
10.1111/1467-9922.00193 · doi-reference
Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications
10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004 · doi-reference