Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Yousif Hanna, Daniel P. McCarthy, Andrea L. Axtell
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
The society of thoracic surgeons composite score for rating program performance for lobectomy for lung cancer
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081 · 2016
Management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: an American college of chest physicians clinical practice guideline
10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.023 · 2025
Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer (VIOLET): a randomized controlled trial
10.3310/thbq1793 · 2022
Ninety-day mortality of thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy: a large multicenter cohort study
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.050 · 2023
Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, VATS, and robotic approaches
10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.010 · 2021
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by VATS versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer
10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017 · 2025
Survival after thoracoscopic surgery or open lobectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.144 · 2021
Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
2013
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage II non-small cell lung cancer
10.1097/sla.0000000000003231 · 2021
Pulmonary open, robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) study: an analysis of 5,721 cases
10.1097/sla.0000000000005115 · 2023
Robotic versus VATS pulmonary lobectomy: reconstructed patient-level meta-analysis
10.21037/jtd-23-582 · 2023
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus VATS for lung lobectomy: a meta-analysis
10.1186/s12885-021-08241-5 · 2021
Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus VATS lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy
2025
The role of lung cancer surgical technique on lymph node sampling and pathologic nodal upstaging
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.09.040 · 2023
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.090 · 2022
Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery for resectable lung cancer
10.1016/j.chest.2019.09.017 · 2020
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer
10.1093/bjs/znab278 · 2021
Comparing outcomes following open, hybrid, minimally invasive, and robotic-assisted esophagectomy
2025
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: nationwide retrospective analysis
10.1097/sla.0000000000003500 · 2021
Outcomes after minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy
2022
Comparison of utilization trends, outcomes, and costs between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy
10.1007/s00464-025-12244-9 · 2025
Recurrence and survival after minimally invasive and open esophagectomy: ENSURE study post hoc analysis
10.1097/sla.0000000000006280 · 2024
Better long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy
10.1245/s10434-022-11922-5 · 2022
Robotic versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review
10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013 · 2021
Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: ROBOT trial
2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I–III thymoma
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.114 · 2020
Comparative effectiveness and cost-efficiency of surgical approaches for thymectomy
10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.037 · 2020
Perioperative outcomes of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.071 · 2022
Thymectomy outcomes in the veterans health administration
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.020 · 2022
Robot-assisted versus open surgery for the resection of large thymomas
10.1002/jso.28113 · 2025
Robot- versus video-assisted surgery for thymoma: a meta-analysis of 7,347 patients
10.1186/s12957-025-04132-2 · 2025
Comparison of minimally invasive thymectomy approaches
10.1093/ejcts/ezaf366 · 2025
Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open thymectomy
10.1093/ejcts/ezac238 · 2022
Robotic-assisted thymectomy for large thymomas
10.21037/jtd-24-637 · 2024
Understanding variation in In-Hospital mortality after major surgery in the United States
10.1097/sla.0000000000005862 · 2023
Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery
10.1002/cncr.33766 · 2021
Understanding failure to rescue after esophagectomy in the United States
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044 · 2020
Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery
10.1097/sla.0000000000001414 · 2016
Participation in targeted quality improvement registries is associated with improved outcomes after esophagectomy
2024
Robotic lobectomy is cost-effective and provides comparable health utility scores to video-assisted lobectomy: early results of the RAVAL trial
10.1097/sla.0000000000006073 · doi-reference
Enhanced recovery decreases pulmonary and cardiac complications after thoracotomy for lung cancer
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.088 · doi-reference
Perioperative lung resection outcomes after implementation of a Multidisciplinary, Evidence-Based Thoracic ERAS Program
10.1097/sla.0000000000003719 · doi-reference