Abstract
Rights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Thijs Devriendt, Clemens Ammann, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Rodrigo Costas, Matthias G. Friedrich, Josep L. Gelpi, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Kari Kuulasmaa, Karim Lekadir, Michaela Th. Mayrhofer, Vaclav Papez, Gerard Pasterkamp, Steffen E. Petersen, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Mahsa Shabani, Giovanni Veronesi, Darian Steven Viezzer, Pascal Borry
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Abstract
Rights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Quality, quantity and harmony: The DataSHaPER approach to integrating data across bioclinical studies.
10.1093/ije/dyq139 · 2010
Toward a roadmap in global biobanking for health.
10.1038/ejhg.2012.96 · 2012
Biobanks in Europe: Prospects for Harmonisation and Networking
2010
Sharing research data to improve public health.
10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62234-9 · 2011
Hidden concerns of sharing research data by low/middle-income country scientists.
10.1080/11287462.2018.1441780 · 2018
Enabling Sharing and Reuse of Scientific Data.
10.1080/13614576.2014.883936 · 2014
Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review.
10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004 · 2019
Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.
10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · 2016
Enhancing Reuse of Data and Biological Material in Medical Research: From FAIR to FAIR-Health.
10.1089/bio.2017.0110 · 2018
The “A” of FAIR - As Open as Possible, as Closed as Necessary.
10.1162/dint_a_00027 · 2020
Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
2016
Cost of not having FAIR research data: Cost-Benefit analysis for FAIR research data
2018
Data model harmonization for the All Of Us Research Program: Transforming i2b2 data into the OMOP common data model.
10.1371/journal.pone.0212463 · 2019
Transforming and evaluating electronic health record disease phenotyping algorithms using the OMOP common data model: a case study in heart failure.
10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab001 · 2021
DataSHIELD: taking the analysis to the data, not the data to the analysis.
10.1093/ije/dyu188 · 2014
Business Models for Sustainable Data Repositories.
10.1787/302b12bb-en · 2017
Networked research infrastructures and their governance: The case of biobanking.
10.1093/scipol/scs033 · 2012
EU-funded initiatives for real world evidence: descriptive analysis of their characteristics and relevance for regulatory decision-making.
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021864 · 2018
Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century.
10.3389/fdata.2019.00043 · 2019
Policy Recommendations: Cost-Benefit analysis for FAIR research data
2018
Model organism databases: Essential resources that need the support of both funders and users.
10.1186/s12915-016-0276-z · 2016
Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC).
10.1186/s13073-020-0713-z · 2020
BBMRI-ERIC as a resource for pharmaceutical and life science industries: The development of biobank-based Expert Centres.
10.1038/ejhg.2014.235 · 2015
National biobanks: Clinical labor, risk production, and the creation of biovalue.
10.1177/0162243909340267 · 2010
Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources.
10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.028 · 2016
Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research.
10.1371/journal.pone.0221496 · 2019
Transnational access to large prospective cohorts in Europe: Current trends and unmet needs.
10.1016/j.nbt.2018.10.001 · 2019
From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees.
10.15252/emmm.201405002 · 2015
Questions for Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.
10.1001/jama.2018.18932 · 2019
Stakeholders’ views on data sharing in multicenter studies.
10.2217/cer-2017-0009 · 2017
Health research access to personal confidential data in England and Wales: assessing any gap in public attitude between preferable and acceptable models of consent.
10.1186/s40504-014-0015-6 · 2014
"Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study.
10.1186/1471-2288-13-72 · 2013
Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: A systematic literature review.
10.1586/14737159.2014.961917 · 2014
Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: A thematic synthesis.
10.1177/1355819617751555 · 2018
“Giving something back”: A systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland [version 2; referees: 2 approved].
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13531.2 · 2019
Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable “direct to patient” enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE).
10.1186/1472-6963-13-422 · 2013
The One-Way Mirror: Public attitudes to commercial access to health data.
2016
The Impact of Commercialisation and Genetic Data Sharing Arrangements on Public Trust and the Intention to Participate in Biobank Research.
10.1159/000375441 · 2015
Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.
10.1038/ejhg.2012.104 · 2013
Wellcome Global Monitor: How does the world feel about science and health?
2019
On the Design of a Blockchain-Based System to Facilitate Healthcare Data Sharing.
10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2018.00190 · doi-reference
Consent Codes: Upholding Standard Data Use Conditions.
10.1371/journal.pgen.1005772 · doi-reference
Responsible sharing of biomedical data and biospecimens via the “Automatable Discovery and Access Matrix” (ADA-M).
10.1038/s41525-018-0057-4 · doi-reference
Analysis of five years of controlled access and data sharing compliance at the International Cancer Genome Consortium.
10.1038/ng.3499 · doi-reference
Better governance, better access: Practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure.
10.1186/s40246-018-0154-6 · doi-reference
Controlled Access under Review: Improving the Governance of Genomic Data Access.
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339 · doi-reference
Registered access: a “Triple-A” approach.
10.1038/ejhg.2016.115 · doi-reference
Data use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directions.
10.1038/ng.3062 · doi-reference
New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information Network.
10.1038/ng2127 · doi-reference
Data sharing in the post-genomic world: The experience of the international cancer genome consortium (ICGC) data access compliance office (DACO).
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549 · doi-reference
Data sharing platforms and the academic evaluation system.
10.15252/embr.202050690 · doi-reference
Towards new tools for bioresource use and sharing.
10.3233/isu-160811 · doi-reference
Open Data Metrics: Lighting the Fire
10.5281/zenodo.3525349 · doi-reference
Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count.
10.5334/dsj-2019-009 · doi-reference
Authorship and contribution disclosures.
10.1126/sciadv.1700404 · doi-reference
Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.
10.1073/pnas.1715374115 · doi-reference
Authorship order.
10.1002/leap.1191 · doi-reference
How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship.
10.1002/leap.1210 · doi-reference
The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship.
10.1371/journal.pone.0184601 · doi-reference
When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.
10.1001/jama.278.7.579 · doi-reference
Evaluating Academic Scientists Collaborating in Team-Based Research: A Proposed Framework.
10.1097/acm.0000000000000759 · doi-reference
Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?
10.1002/asi.1097 · doi-reference
Data Sharing.
10.1056/nejme1516564 · doi-reference
Benefit sharing and biobanking in Australia.
10.1177/0963662511402425 · doi-reference
Privatizing biomedical research-a 'third way'.
10.1038/nbt0108-31 · doi-reference
Identifying the nature and extent of public and donor concern about the commercialisation of biobanks for genomic research.
10.1038/s41431-020-00746-0 · doi-reference
The metric tide : report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
10.4135/9781473978782 · doi-reference