Abstract
Katharina Lüthy, Claudia Riesmeyer, Jessica Kühn, Estelle Blättermann, Felix Forster, Katja Radon, Tobias Weinmann
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 Khz to 300 Ghz)
10.1097/hp.0000000000001210 · 2020
The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders
10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.04.003 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: a systematic literature review
10.1038/jes.2017.13 · 2018
Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (rf-emf) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits
10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.007 · 2014
Long-term residential magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative disease mortality: an 18-year Nationwide cohort study in Switzerland
10.1016/j.envint.2026.110145 · 2026
Unresolved referenced work
2026
Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk – cosmos, a prospective cohort study
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108552 · 2024
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on Cancer risk in the general and working population: a systematic review of human observational studies – part I: Most researched outcomes
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 · 2024
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: results from the international Mobi-kids study
10.1016/j.envint.2021.107069 · 2022
Long-term effect of Mobile phone use on sleep quality: results from the cohort study of Mobile phone use and health (Cosmos)
10.1016/j.envint.2020.105687 · 2020
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis on human observational studies
10.1016/j.envint.2023.108338 · 2024
Exposure perception as a key indicator of risk perception and acceptance of sources of radio frequency electromagnetic fields
10.1155/2015/198272 · 2015
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Better writing in scientific publications builds reader confidence and understanding
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714321 · 2021
Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: evidence from metacognition
10.1177/0963662519865687 · 2019
People’s responses to risks of electromagnetic fields and trust in government policy: the role of perceived risk, benefits and control
10.1080/13669877.2012.761270 · 2013
Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5g-related electromagnetic fields
10.12688/openreseurope.19236.2 · 2025
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Teachers as multipliers of knowledge about schistosomiasis: a possible approach for health education programmes
10.1186/s12879-022-07829-x · 2022
Knowledge, risk perception and information needs of general practitioners regarding potential health effects of electromagnetic fields: a scoping review of the scientific literature
10.1051/radiopro/2023038 · 2024
Predictors of risk perception among general practitioners and paediatricians concerning potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields
10.1002/bem.70047 · 2026
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields
10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817 · 2010
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 · 1989
Acceptance determinants of 5g services
10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.006 · 2021
Psychological drivers of individual differences in risk perception: a systematic case study focusing on 5G
10.1177/0956797621998312 · 2021
Media health literacy (Mhl): development and measurement of the concept among adolescents
10.1093/her/cyr007 · 2011
5g and Emf exposure: misinformation, open questions, and potential solutions
10.3389/frcmn.2021.635716 · 2021
Relationship between digital health literacy, distrust in the health system and health anxiety in health sciences students
10.1186/s12909-025-06903-7 · 2025
Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain
10.1002/ejsp.2530 · 2018
Understanding conspiracy theories
10.1111/pops.12568 · 2019
The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5g: spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546 · 2022
The 5g Covid-19 digital wildfire: an evolving network of twitter contacts to explore phase transition metaphors in viral misinformation
10.1371/journal.pone.0343661 · 2026
Unresolved referenced work
2024
Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge
10.1111/0272-4332.205064 · 2000
Perception of Mobile phone and Base Station risks
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00672.x · 2005
Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (emf) risks
10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · 2003
(un)healthy behavior? The relationship between media literacy, nutritional behavior, and self-representation on Instagram
10.17645/mac.v7i2.1871 · doi-reference
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation
10.1098/rsos.211719 · doi-reference
Conspiracy theory beliefs and political trust: the moderating role of political communication
10.17645/pag.v10i4.5755 · doi-reference
Covid-19 conspiracies, trust in authorities, and duty to comply with social distancing restrictions
10.1007/s43576-021-00042-x · doi-reference
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586 · doi-reference
Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories
10.1002/acp.3301 · doi-reference
Conspiracy theories: a public health concern and how to address it
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682931 · doi-reference
Health conspiracy theories: a scoping review of drivers, impacts, and countermeasures
10.1186/s12939-025-02451-0 · doi-reference
Conspiracies and the nocebo effect during the Covid-19 pandemic
10.1093/pubmed/fdab327 · doi-reference
Traumatic rift: how conspiracy beliefs undermine cohesion after societal trauma?
10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1699 · doi-reference
The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions
10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · doi-reference
The antidepressant hoax: conspiracy theories decrease health-seeking intentions
10.1111/bjso.12426 · doi-reference
The psychology of conspiracy theories
10.1177/0963721417718261 · doi-reference
Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories
10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101363 · doi-reference
Stan: a probabilistic programming language
10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · doi-reference
Ordinal regression models in psychology: a tutorial
10.1177/2515245918823199 · doi-reference
Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan
10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · doi-reference
Explaining media trust among journalists and recipients: different experiences, different predictors?
10.1177/14648849231190698 · doi-reference
Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: implications for theory and measurement
10.1111/bjop.12231 · doi-reference
Pylons ablaze: examining the role of 5g Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence
10.1111/bjso.12394 · doi-reference
Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland Vor Und Während Der Corona-Pandemie
10.1055/a-1560-2479 · doi-reference
Acceptance of 5G technology: mediation role of trust and concentration
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · doi-reference
Risk perception: reflections on 40 years of research
10.1111/risa.13599 · doi-reference
Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians
10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9 · doi-reference
Risk perception of electromagnetic fields among school teachers and nursery school teachers: a mixed-methods study
10.1186/s12889-026-27964-3 · doi-reference
Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior
10.1177/0022022105275962 · doi-reference
Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (emf) risks
10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · doi-reference
Perception of Mobile phone and Base Station risks
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00672.x · doi-reference
The 5g Covid-19 digital wildfire: an evolving network of twitter contacts to explore phase transition metaphors in viral misinformation
10.1371/journal.pone.0343661 · doi-reference
The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5g: spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546 · doi-reference
Understanding conspiracy theories
10.1111/pops.12568 · doi-reference
Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain
10.1002/ejsp.2530 · doi-reference
Relationship between digital health literacy, distrust in the health system and health anxiety in health sciences students
10.1186/s12909-025-06903-7 · doi-reference
5g and Emf exposure: misinformation, open questions, and potential solutions
10.3389/frcmn.2021.635716 · doi-reference
Media health literacy (Mhl): development and measurement of the concept among adolescents
10.1093/her/cyr007 · doi-reference
Psychological drivers of individual differences in risk perception: a systematic case study focusing on 5G
10.1177/0956797621998312 · doi-reference
Acceptance determinants of 5g services
10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.006 · doi-reference
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 · doi-reference
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields
10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817 · doi-reference
Predictors of risk perception among general practitioners and paediatricians concerning potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields
10.1002/bem.70047 · doi-reference