Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Divya Gupta, Abhijit P Pakhare, Tulasi Sindhuja, Rajendra K Shukla, Ashish Anantrao Jadhav, Rashmi Chowdhary, Ashok Kumar
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
10.1016/j.ecl.2022.02.008 · 2022
Atherogenic lipoprotein determinants of cardiovascular disease and residual risk among individuals with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
10.1161/jaha.117.005549 · 2017
HDL and cardiovascular disease: atherogenic and atheroprotective mechanisms
10.1038/nrcardio.2010.222 · 2011
Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease
10.1001/jama.285.19.2481 · 2001
Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
1994
Measuring LDL cholesterol: for old and new calculations, is there an optimal formula?
10.1373/clinchem.2014.232793 · 2014
LDL cholesterol performance of beta quantification reference measurement procedure
10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.018 · 2014
Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge
10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499 · 1972
Friedewald equation underestimates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at low concentrations in young people with and without type 1 diabetes
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
ror
Confidence 99%
ror
Confidence 99%
ror
Confidence 99%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02888.x · 2010
The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations
10.1515/cclm.2001.068 · 2001
Effects of total cholesterol and triglyceride on the percentage difference between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration measured directly and calculated using the Friedewald formula
10.1515/cclm.2008.064 · 2008
Increased prevalence of smaller and denser LDL particles in Asian Indians
10.1161/01.atv.19.11.2749 · 1999
LDL-cholesterol: Friedewald calculated versus direct measurement-study from a large Indian laboratory database
10.4103/2230-8210.137496 · 2014
Comparison of two methods of estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the direct versus Friedewald estimation
10.1007/bf02867401 · 2005
Does LDL-C estimation using Anandaraja's formula give a better agreement with direct LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald's formula?
10.1007/s12291-011-0186-3 · 2012
Lipoprotein abnormalities in South Asians and its association with cardiovascular disease: current state and future directions
10.4330/wjc.v8.i3.247 · 2016
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population
10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.009 · 2005
Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile
10.1001/jama.2013.280532 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method
10.1002/sim.3086 · 2008
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility
1989
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines
10.1161/01.cir.0000133317.49796.0e · 2004
A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study
10.1001/jama.1986.03380170088024 · 1986
2025 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines focused update: intensifying prevention, risk stratification, and therapy
10.1016/j.amjcard.2026.02.059 · 2026
AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824 · 2011
AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824 · doi-reference
2025 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines focused update: intensifying prevention, risk stratification, and therapy
10.1016/j.amjcard.2026.02.059 · doi-reference
A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study
10.1001/jama.1986.03380170088024 · doi-reference
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines
10.1161/01.cir.0000133317.49796.0e · doi-reference
Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method
10.1002/sim.3086 · doi-reference
Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile
10.1001/jama.2013.280532 · doi-reference
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population
10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.009 · doi-reference
Lipoprotein abnormalities in South Asians and its association with cardiovascular disease: current state and future directions
10.4330/wjc.v8.i3.247 · doi-reference
Does LDL-C estimation using Anandaraja's formula give a better agreement with direct LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald's formula?
10.1007/s12291-011-0186-3 · doi-reference
Comparison of two methods of estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the direct versus Friedewald estimation
10.1007/bf02867401 · doi-reference
LDL-cholesterol: Friedewald calculated versus direct measurement-study from a large Indian laboratory database
10.4103/2230-8210.137496 · doi-reference
Increased prevalence of smaller and denser LDL particles in Asian Indians
10.1161/01.atv.19.11.2749 · doi-reference
Effects of total cholesterol and triglyceride on the percentage difference between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration measured directly and calculated using the Friedewald formula
10.1515/cclm.2008.064 · doi-reference
The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations
10.1515/cclm.2001.068 · doi-reference
Friedewald equation underestimates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at low concentrations in young people with and without type 1 diabetes
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02888.x · doi-reference
Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge
10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499 · doi-reference
LDL cholesterol performance of beta quantification reference measurement procedure
10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.018 · doi-reference
Measuring LDL cholesterol: for old and new calculations, is there an optimal formula?
10.1373/clinchem.2014.232793 · doi-reference
Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease
10.1001/jama.285.19.2481 · doi-reference
HDL and cardiovascular disease: atherogenic and atheroprotective mechanisms
10.1038/nrcardio.2010.222 · doi-reference
Atherogenic lipoprotein determinants of cardiovascular disease and residual risk among individuals with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
10.1161/jaha.117.005549 · doi-reference
Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
10.1016/j.ecl.2022.02.008 · doi-reference